ICT and Social
Exclusion
|
|
EURIM Modernising Government Theme – Working
Group on Social Exclusion. Draft Scoping notes - December 2002 |
|
|
|
This
note is the revised version of that used to set the scene for the scoping
meeting held on 30th October. It is incorporates some key issues
and insights identified as missing in the initial draft. It should be read in
conjunction with the detailed minutes & references issued after the
meeting held on the 30th. |
|
|
|
This
note & the minutes will be used at the meeting on 11th
December to help us asses what the scope of our activity as a Eurim working
group should be, and to help us set priorities for our way forward. It will
also be used after the 11th to seek input from a much wider
audience of interested parties. |
|
|
|
CONTEXT. |
|
|
|
1.
The ICT (Information & Communications
Technologies) revolution is creating a diversity of capabilities whose
exploitation is becoming pervasive in every corner of the modern economy –
and increasingly fundamental to the operation of most facets of the modern
economy. |
|
2.
The impact of the exploitation of these
technologies is so widespread that the question has to be asked as to their
impact with regard to social exclusion. |
|
a.
Their impact on the nature of work threatens the
employability of a significant portion of those of our fellow citizens whose
levels of illiteracy and/or innumeracy, or levels of cognitive & learning
difficulties, or physical or audio & visual impairments puts them at
risk. |
|
b.
Their impact on most aspects of our living
environment, on the services that we daily rely on, on our wider lives,
leisure & cultural activities, widen their potential for impacting
exclusion, positively and negatively: increasing ‘transactionalisation &
automation’ of services (reducing the human element) and the ability to
‘identify the end user’ and focus, target services accordingly raises the
risk of forms of discrimination that will further & adversely impact
exclusion. |
|
c.
In an ageing population, longer life can also be
associated with increasing levels of cognitive, communicative & learning
difficulties, and physical or audio & visual impairments – so the
population ‘at risk’ will grow and with it the potential for an even wider
exclusion. |
|
d.
As the government moves to exploit the
capabilities of ICT to modernise, streamline and underpin the wide range of
interactions of the modern state with its citizens (ranging from those of the
educational & social services to the fundamentals of democracy such as
voting & political communication) those who lack the capacity for basic
‘cyber-literacy’ will similarly be at risk of marginalisation. |
|
3.
Equally, the same innovative forces that drive
the ICT revolution may carry the potential to generate a diversity of
capabilities ‘fit-for-purpose, fit-for-use’ for the illiterate, the
innumerate, the learning & cognitively challenged, and the physically
challenged & disabled in ways that could be strongly socially inclusive.
With focus and determination, their risk of being at a permanent comparative
disadvantage as the ICT revolution progresses could be tackled head on –
creating with technology highly responsive, user friendly capabilities that
work to increase social inclusion & coherence. |
|
A
MAJOR CHALLENGE |
|
4.
There is a broad political agreement in the UK
as to the size of the population ‘at risk’.
The Government's figure is 25 million. |
|
a.
Government has already committed itself to
‘access for all who need it’ by 2005; this will coincide with the
implementation of the Freedom of Information Act and overlay the Disability
Discrimination Act. |
|
b.
Some 80%+ of the Government’s total citizen
transactions are reported as being with people in former Social Classes C2, D
and E. These are almost precisely the same people who are not currently ICT connected.
The issue of ensuring access is subject to major political commitment
and scrutiny. However, the twin issues of ‘fit-for-purpose and fit for
use’ access for those who are significantly challenged seems to gain less
attention. The Government says that approximately 1/5 of its 25
million show some evidence of wanting to be connected but the other 4/5 do
not (the ‘can’t, won’t, don’t reality).
Heavy investment in ICT in modernising of labour intensive areas such as
benefits & health may in practice bring few counterbalancing savings on
staff costs. |
|
c.
In cutting unemployment Government strategy has
largely revolved around improving basic skills in reading, writing, numeracy
and in ICT processes. It is precisely those areas where the division of
labour operates most effectively and in the processing of routine that
machine processing will make most impact. This risks cutting yet more people
with only the most basic skills to offer permanently out of the labour
market. |
|
d.
The Government has invested heavily in a network
of ICT online centres with a wide geographic footprint, now well established
operations but focused more on addressing learning & skills imperatives
than other core issues in the social exclusion challenge. |
|
e.
A wider policy learning of all recent
governments has been the limitations of apparently well thought out top-down
programmes to create effective ‘pull’ from the grass roots & local
communities where the complex realities of social change, including the
challenges of social exclusion, are tackled in practice. |
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
|
|
|
5.
The EURIM task is to inform the policy debate. On
current evidence a wide range of groups in the UK are active on particular
dimensions of the issues set out here. Examples range from work to improve
the access of the disabled to employment in the ICT sector, to the
exploitation of the capabilities of modern ICT to improve the life quality of
particular groups of the disabled such as the blind and the deaf. The ICT
industry is innovating technologies that have great potential – such as the
use of voice input to computers. The Government is investing heavily in
tackling the underlying agenda of social exclusion. |
|
6.
The proposal is that EURIM provides the
opportunity for a consultation with a ‘wide audience’ on the essence of the
issues set out above, so as to create an informed debate and to allow the
writing of an informed paper that gives substance to the policy issues at
stake. |
|
7.
The ‘wide audience’ will include the ICT
industry and its associated trade associations & bodies of professionals
(for example Intellect, the WCIT, the BCS etc.), the charitable and
campaigning groups that work with the physically and the cognitively disabled
etc., academic centres of focus on social exclusion (for example the Centre
for Social Analysis of Social Exclusion at the LSE) and on the impacts of the
ICT revolution, other pressure groups, charities and think-tanks as relevant,
as well as the Social Exclusion unit in the Cabinet Office. Relevant
international developments (including within the rest of Europe, and from
North America) will be sought. |
|
|
|
Richard
Sykes (with acknowledgements to Henryk Trzebiatowski (Consignia) and Kevin
Carey (HumanITy) for their collaboration and the wide ranging inputs that
were developed at the launch meeting on the 30th October 2002.
These are recorded in the minutes of that meeting, which are either attached
or available on request from Emma Fryer: Emma.fryer@eurim.org
). |
|
(6th
December 2002) |